Category Archives: Robotics

Robot Sex Week (Part IV): Touch-a Touch-a Touch-a Touch Me, I Wanna Be Dirty

“A great science fiction detective story” - Ian Watson, author of The Universal Machine

Luck and Death at the Edge of the World

Don´t you dare! I know you want to rush straight on to the sexy stuff, but first you should click on the Luck & Death banner, above.

For a limited time you can order a special edition of the book at the regular retail price of $5.00. Free sample chapters are available, as is an MP3 sample chapter for your iPod or other device. If you enjoy this site, try it!

Okay, now that you´ve clicked and ordered your copy, by all means move on to the Robot Sex…

The secondary title of this installment of Robot Sex Week — or Sex, Intimacy, and Artificial Humans, as it´s formally known — comes from the Rocky Horror Picture Show of course, when staid Janet bursts into song upon finally realizing that she really, no really, wants to have sex for the first time.

And, as the song implies, there is no sex without a sense of touch.

That might seem obvious, but when it comes to robot sex, we are not the only ones who need a sense of touch. For an artificial person to be able to realistically engage in sex instead of lying inert or fumbling around like the worst teenage virgin, it too must have a sense of touch.

Enter haptic technology — the technology of touch.

A good introduction to haptic technology can be found in Technology Based On Touch: Haptics Technology by Sharma et al, while some indication of the growth of haptics can be found in Analysis of Haptics Evolution from Web Search Engines’ Data by Guerraz and Loscos.

Primitive haptic technology

Primitive haptic technology

You probably know haptic technology primarily through touch-screens, but more sophisticated versions of haptics are on their way. They promise to do two things.

First, they will extend our ability to interact with virtual realities. We will finally be able to actually feel the virtual worlds which at present we mostly just see and hear. As Stephen Brewster puts it in The Impact of Haptic ‘Touching’ Technology on Cultural Applications:

New technologies from the area of virtual reality (VR) now allow computer users to use their sense of touch to feel virtual objects. Touch is a very powerful sense but it has so far been neglected in computing. State-of-the-art haptic (or force-feedback) devices allow users to feel and touch virtual objects with a high degree of realism. An artefact’s surface properties can be modelled so that someone using a haptic device could feel it as a solid, three-dimensional object with different textures, hardness or softness.

Touching the virtual world

Touching the virtual world

To see an example of how haptics are beginning to be applied in practical ways to virtual environments — in this case for medical training — see the first video embedded at the end of this post.

Second, and more relevant for our purposes here, improved haptic technologies will extend the ability of our technology to feel our world and thus interact with us in our natural setting.

To see an approximation of the second phenomenon, see the second video. Note that in this video the haptic technology is being used to provide sensory feedback — a sense of touch — through a robotic device to the surgeon who is operating it. This allows surgeons to operate via robots over great distances without losing a key sensory input.

What will be necessary for a sexually-capable robot, however, is that the haptic feedback not go back to a human, but to the operating system of the robot itself.

The morning after

The post-coital moment

Without effective haptics, a robot´s movements won´t be realistic and, perhaps more importantly, won´t be responsive, the way a human sexual partner´s movements are. Without that, robot sex is unlikely to be anything more than a novelty.

After all, a great part of the pleasure in sex comes not just from being touched, but from touching and from having your touch evoke a reaction.

Of course, one of the issues that always arises when one considers that homo artificialis might operate at a human level in some area — for instance with respect to artificial intelligence and the Turing Test — is, given their adaptability compared with natural persons, isn´t it likely that they will exceed us?

At a minimum it seems possible that a highly capable artificial body, animated by a sophisticated artificial intelligence, will bring some genuinely new experiences to human sexual activity.

And if homo artificialis actually becomes sentient, and particularly if it also becomes independent, maybe it won´t bother having sex with us anymore, or at least won´t have sex exclusively with us. We´re so limited in our capabilities, after all.

Wouldn´t you, if you were a sentient artificial person capable of revamping your body and adjusting your sensory inputs, invent entirely new kinds of sex altogether and engage in them with others who were as capable as you?

Videos

Haptics as an element of virtual reality:

Haptics as a feedback system for robotic devices (discussion of haptics begins at 1:20):

Tagged , , , ,

Sex Times Technology Equals the Future: Robot Sex Week (Part III)

“A great science fiction detective story” - Ian Watson, author of The Universal Machine

Luck and Death at the Edge of the World

Hang on! I know it´s Robot Sex Week and you´re feeling an urgent need to get to the post itself, but before moving on, don´t forget to click on the Luck & Death banner, above.

For a limited time you can order a special edition of the book at the regular retail price of $5.00. Free sample chapters are available, as is an MP3 sample chapter for your iPod or other device. If you enjoy this site, try it!

Okay, Robot Sex Week…

Yesterday we dealt with the prospects for robot love — today we´re sticking entirely to sex.

This series is officially known as Sex, Intimacy, and Artificial Humans, but in honour of today´s purely prurient topic we´re shamelessly going with its informal name: Robot Sex Week.

J.G. Ballard once said Sex times technology equals the future. Was he right?

Will we start copulating with our machines? Let me ask it the other way around: is there any reason to think that we won´t?

No, if the history of technology is any indication.

Note: A special thanks to the reader who wrote me to point out that many women are already having sex with robots — I still am not sure if she was referring to vibrators or unsatisfying partners. And on that note, my apologies to any staight female or gay male readers. Fembots dominate the images available, and I´m under time constraints today, so no Boybot booty in this post — in my defence, though, the first post in this series featured a distinctly male artificial sex partner.

Cylon -- that is, artificial human -- `Six´ from Battlestar Galactica.

Cylon — that is, artificial human — `Six´ from Battlestar Galactica.

It´s become almost a cliche to note that each new communications technology that develops is able to make the jump from the beta test stage to something commercially viable by channeling pornography. I´m going to adjust that notion in a moment, but first let´s look at it.

The Independent newspaper has a nifty little slideshow that traces some elements of this trend. It covers the Super 8 projector, the Polaroid camera, the VCR, the DVD player, the internet, VOIP (voice over internet protocol), and pay-per-view.

The Guardian agrees with The Independent:

As one senior industry figure put it: ‘For years it has been a dirty secret that one of the key drivers of new consumer technology is sex, pornography. The need to make 3G technology work – and work fast – is exposing that secret.’

Canadian journalist Patchen Barss, who wrote the book The Erotic Engine: How Pornography has Powered Mass Communication, from Gutenberg to Google cites ten technologies that were built on porn: e-commerce, streaming video, webcams, high bandwidth, BBSs, subtitles and closed captioning, microfiche, digital cameras, cable television, and the VCR.

Sexual robot fantasy art

Sexual robot fantasy art

To take the example of the internet, according to the tech news site The Goldstein Report, one porn site alone, Xvideos, gets `4.4 billion page views per month. That’s about 10 times as many as the New York Times and three times as many as CNN.com,´ while New Technology News claims that Porn Accounts For One-Third Of Global Web Traffic.

In 2010 NPR reported that porn providers were looking to cash in on the iPhone 4´s then-new FaceTime feature pretty much the moment it became available.

So what´s my quibble with the formulation of the rule and why is it relevant to robot sex?

  • First, the phenomenon is usually cited as involving communications technology, but I´d suggest that any technology that can deliver any facsimile of sex will follow the trend.
  • Second, the driving factor is sexual desire, not specifically a desire for pornography, so — putting aside for the moment the fact that some people may consider sex with an artificial person inherently pornographic — my argument is that the trend isn´t limited to porn.

So overall my hypothesis is that as robots become capable of delivering sexual thrills, we will accept those thrills gratefully — maybe even greedily — the way we have with each of the preceding technologies.

How close must the resemblance get before it´s close enough?

How close must the resemblance get before it´s close enough?

And of course, as with any technology, there are the early adopters, in this case robot fetishists — see the video from Discovery embedded below.

Fetishits may constitute a minority community, but my bet is that as our robots become more capable and less artificial, the sexual majority will adopt their practices, not as a fetish, but simply as one more sexual outlet.

I´ll happily hear from those who agree or disagree — you can always email me at nas@nassauhedron.com.

Tomorrow: Day 4 of Robot Sex Week — Don´t Miss It!

Tagged , , , ,

The Skin We Live In: Skin for Robots, the Mechanics + the Meaning [news item, research papers, video]

“A great science fiction detective story” - Ian Watson, author of The Universal Machine

Luck and Death at the Edge of the World

A news item about a new artificial skin for robots that gives them a haptic sense — the ability to feel — has been getting a lot of play lately.

I haven’t found the particular paper referenced in the item except behind a paywall, but the topic of sensitive robotic skin is the subject of a number of papers that are freely available and I’ve provided links to eight of them below

Research in this area is pragmatic, as one might expect. Giving a robot a sense of touch is an important safety issue.  Robots have traditionally been segregated from human beings in labs or on the factory floor.  Increasingly, however, we share the same space — they have become our housecleaners and they are beginning to drive our cars (even legally, on public roads).

As this process progresses, building haptic sensitivity into our robotics becomes more and more important if robots are to be able to avoid accidentally damaging our property and our bodies.

But embodying our robots in sensitive bodies will also begin to have deeper effects on our lives and integrate us in ways that might not seem obvious at first glance.

Robonaut and astronaut, after Michelangelo

Robonaut and astronaut, after Michelangelo (click image for article)

Touch has a social meaning.  Human being don’t just communicate through words and gestures — at a profound level that is engrained both evolutionarily and culturally, we engage in haptic communictaion.  Touching each other means something and it can also evoke a powerful response that is sometimes beyond our conscious control, whether it is a modestly interactive handshake, a more expressive kiss on both cheeks or arm around the shoulder, or a more intimate kiss, stroke, embrace, or massage.

And, of course, haptics are not only being embedded in the artificial bodies we build to function in the physical world, but are also increasingly also being built into the artificial worlds in which we natural humans spend more and more of our time.  For now practical, commercially viable haptics are limited to the controls on our devices, but given how ubiquitous these controls have become, isn’t it inevitable that the online environment (and other artificial places) will become something we can touch through our avatars?

By embodying our robotics in haptically-enabled forms and by increasingly overlapping our environment with our robots, we are necessarily inviting them into the pre-existing and emotionally charged world of our haptic interaction and by embedding haptics in our artificial environments we are pushing the same boundary in the other direction.

Below: a skinless animatronic baby. It’s creepy precisely because while it looks mechanical, its gestures nonethelss evoke an innate, involuntary protective response. When gestures are combined with and made interactive with a responsive, flesh-like skin, this type of response will be intensified.

Research on Sensitive Robot Skin [all in PDF format]

Tagged , , , , ,

The Robot Zoo of the Future [two articles, related video]

“A great science fiction detective story” - Ian Watson, author of The Universal Machine

Read articles about the future of robot zoos here and here.

Watch Shiva the awesome robot tiger below (or if embedded video doesn’t play, watch it here).  Shiva was built by Belgian artist Kezanti.

In 1930, Robots Were Stealing Musicians’ Jobs

“A great science fiction detective story” - Ian Watson, author of The Universal Machine

Read the article here.

A video (not from the article) of robotic band EOL (End of Life) playing Marilyn Manson’s The Beautiful People is embedded below.  If it doesn’t play properly, watch it here.

You may also want to take a look at (or listen to) Free: The Future of a Radical Price by Chris Anderson, in which he discusses the history of copyright and today’s copyright crisis and its historical relation to automated music in the form of player pianos.  You can get a zip file of the audiobook for free here

A Swarm of Nano Quadrotors

If embedded video does not play, view it here.

Kevin Warwick (“Captain Cyborg”): Google Interview [video]

If embed doesn’t play properly, view it here.  Includes comments on his robot with a biological brain [rat].

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 188 other followers